Without Circumcision

With the new era inaugurated by Jesus, circumcision is no longer the required sign of membership in the covenant community.

Circumcision is an obstacle to any claim that believers must keep the regulations of the Mosaic Law to be saved. Circumcision was the entrance rite of the covenant with Abraham. Moreover, it was mandatory under the Law given through Moses at Mount Sinai; it was never optional. Therefore, if circumcision is no longer required for membership in the People of God, the jurisdiction or content of the Mosaic Law has changed, if not ended.

[Photo by Gaurav K on Unsplash]

Circumcision was fundamental to the identity of the nation of Israel, the “sign” that separated the people of God from the Gentile nations. Yet the New Testament declares that circumcision is not required for the followers of Jesus. In Genesis, God declared:

• “I will establish my covenant between me and you (Abraham) and your seed after you for an everlasting covenant…. This is my covenant which you will keep between me and you and your seed after you; every male among you shall be circumcised.” – (Genesis 17:7-14).

Circumcision was the “sign” of God’s covenant with Abraham. An uncircumcised male was, by definition, outside the covenant and “cut off from his people since he has broken my covenant.” Likewise, the legislation given at Sinai required all males to be circumcised on the “eighth day” - (Exodus 12:43-48, Leviticus 12:1-3, John 7:22-23. Compare Acts 7:8).

In contrast to the ancient legislation, the Apostle Paul wrote - “If you get circumcised Christ will profit you nothing. Yea, I bear witness again to every man who gets circumcised that he is indebted to do the whole law. You have been set aside from Christ, you who are justified from the law; you have fallen out of his grace” - (Galatians 5:2-4).

By the first century, circumcision was so fundamental to the self-identity of Jews that it was common to categorize the Jewish people as “the Circumcision,” and the Gentiles as the “Un-Circumcision.”

An uncircumcised Jew was a contradiction in terms. To be Jewish and male was to be circumcised. It was the most basic requirement for male Gentiles when they converted to the Jewish religion - (Acts 10:45, 11:2-3, Romans 4:9-10).

Peter preached to Gentiles for the first time in the City of Caesarea. Before he finished speaking, the Holy Spirit fell on his audience, and they began to speak in tongues, just as Jewish believers did on the Day of Pentecost.

Uncircumcised Gentiles received the same gift as circumcised Jewish believers. Peter’s companions were amazed, not that Gentiles spoke in tongues, but “because on uncircumcised Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Spirit” - (Acts 2:1-4, 10:44-48).

Rather than circumcise his Gentile converts, Peter baptized them in water “in the name of Jesus Christ” despite their uncircumcised state. Upon his return to Jerusalem, certain Jews confronted Peter:

• (Acts 11:1-3) – “Now the Apostles and the brethren who were throughout Judaea heard that the Gentiles also had welcomed the word of God. And when Peter came up to Jerusalem, they of the circumcision began to find fault with him, saying, he went in unto men uncircumcised and ate with them.”

The Gift of the Spirit was the definitive proof that God had accepted uncircumcised Gentiles as Gentiles into the Assembly How could Peter or the other Apostles then turn around and require circumcision of Gentile converts or anyone else?

The controversy did not immediately cease, and circumcision remained fundamental to Jewish self-identity, even among some members of the Church.  Later, certain Jewish followers of Jesus stirred up the congregation in Antioch by claiming, “Except you get circumcised after the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved.”

THE CONTINUING DEBATE

To address the dispute in Antioch, a council was assembled in Jerusalem. It concluded that circumcision was no longer required, at least, not for Gentiles. The Jewish believers who were “troubling” Gentiles were to cease compelling non-Jewish believers to undergo circumcision.

Believers must not be required to become circumcised or come under the jurisdiction of the Torah, only they must “abstain from things sacrificed to idols, from blood, from things strangled and from fornication” so as not to offend the sensibilities of Jewish believers in Jesus - (Acts 15:27-29).

The issue arose again when certain “men from Jerusalem” arrived in Galatia, claiming that Gentiles must be circumcised to “complete” their faith.  Paul’s response was swift and unequivocal - If a believer is circumcised, “Christ will profit him nothing.” Anyone who “receives circumcision becomes a debtor to do the whole law” and places himself under its “curse.” He becomes “severed from Christ… fallen from grace” - (Galatians 3:3, 3:10-11, 5:2-4).

Circumcision is no longer a sign for determining who is a member of the people of God - “In Christ Jesus, neither circumcision avails anything nor uncircumcision, but rather faith working through love.” The old categories no longer apply - (Colossians 3:11, 1 Corinthians 7:18-19).

Circumcision is not inherently evil or good. As to a man’s standing before God, however, it is a matter of indifference. The “true circumcision” consists of those men who “worship God in the spirit and rejoice in Christ Jesus and have no confidence in the flesh.” They are “circumcised with the circumcision made without hands” - (Philippians 3:3, Colossians 2:11).

The Torah required those under its jurisdiction to keep all its regulations. It was not a pick-and-choose menu, but an all-or-nothing proposition. Obligating a man to get circumcised also obligated him to keep all the statutes and rituals included in the Law.

• As the Torah itself declared - “Accursed is every man who continues not in all things written in the book of the law, to do them” – (Deuteronomy 27:26. See also, Galatians 3:10).

This historical and scriptural background creates a dilemma for anyone who teaches that the followers of Jesus must conform to the requirements of the Mosaic Law, or that doing so is mandatory for right standing before God.

Either the early church was mistaken in its decision about circumcision, or a major reassessment of the Torah was, and perhaps still is, necessary. Under the Law, circumcision is mandatory and foundational for membership in the covenant community.

However, if uncircumcised Gentiles now receive the Spirit of God, then the old system has been changed, and fundamentally so. Their possession of the Spirit demonstrates that God accepts Gentiles without circumcision. This means that with the Death and Resurrection of Jesus, there has been a radical change in the status of the Law of Moses, and in the identification of the people of God.

[PDF Copy]

SEE ALSO:

• Delivered from this Evil Age - (Paul anchored all that God has done in the resurrection of Jesus, which also inaugurated the Messianic Age - Galatians 1:1-5)

• Proclaiming Another Gospel - (The Judaizing faction in Galatia proclaimed a message that deviated from the Apostolic Tradition and twisted the true Gospel – Galatians 1:6-12)

• Conflict in Galatia - (The key issue in Galatia was whether Gentiles must be circumcised and keep some, at least, of the deeds required by the Torah)